IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/sactxx/v1997y1997i2p160-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credibility using a loss function from Spline theory

Author

Listed:
  • Virginia R. Young

Abstract

Current formulas in credibility theory often calculate net premium as a weighted sum of the average experience of the policyholder and the average experience of the entire collection of policyholders. Because these formulas are linear, they are easy to use. Another advantage of linear formulas is that the estimate changes a fixed amount per change in claim experience; if an insurer uses such a formula, then the policyholder can predict the change in premium. On the other hand, Venter (1990) points out that in some cases, the loss of accuracy makes a linear formula undesirable. We apply decision theory to develop a credibility formula that minimizes a loss function that is a linear combination of a squared-error term and a second-derivative term. The squared-error term measures the accuracy of the estimator, while the second-derivative term constrains the estimator to be close to linear. An actuary may balance the sometimes conflicting goals of accuracy and linearity by changing a single parameter in the loss function. Our loss function is similar to one used in spline theory, although in a different context.

Suggested Citation

  • Virginia R. Young, 1997. "Credibility using a loss function from Spline theory," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1997(2), pages 160-185.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:1997:y:1997:i:2:p:160-185
    DOI: 10.1080/03461238.1997.10413985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03461238.1997.10413985
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03461238.1997.10413985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:sactxx:v:1997:y:1997:i:2:p:160-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/sact .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.