IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rwinxx/v42y2017i1p92-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new transboundary freshwater dispute before the International Court of Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Tamar Meshel

Abstract

On 6 June 2016 Chile submitted its long-standing dispute with Bolivia concerning the Silala/Siloli watercourse to the International Court of Justice. Since 1997 Bolivia has contended that the watercourse is not international and that it therefore belongs exclusively to Bolivia. In its application, Chile requested that the court “declare that the Silala River system is in fact and in law an international watercourse whose use by Chile and Bolivia is governed by customary international law”. This case has the potential to produce a landmark decision in the international water law field since it is the first time that a dispute concerning the status of a watercourse as international has been submitted to the court. If the court finds that the Silala/Siloli is indeed an international watercourse, it will have a unique opportunity to clarify states’ substantive and procedural obligations with respect to its use.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamar Meshel, 2017. "A new transboundary freshwater dispute before the International Court of Justice," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 92-96, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rwinxx:v:42:y:2017:i:1:p:92-96
    DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2016.1249247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02508060.2016.1249247
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02508060.2016.1249247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Mulligan & G. Eckstein, 2011. "The Silala/Siloli Watershed: Dispute over the Most Vulnerable Basin in South America," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(03), pages 595-606.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rwinxx:v:42:y:2017:i:1:p:92-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rwin20 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.