IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rwinxx/v41y2016i6p866-882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing water augmentation under the Watercourse Convention

Author

Listed:
  • Rhett B. Larson

Abstract

This article evaluates how the UN Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses can be interpreted and implemented to facilitate responsible and equitable implementation of water augmentation technology. Innovation in technology that has the potential to augment water supplies, like desalination or cloud seeding, may aggravate or mitigate conflict over shared international rivers or lakes. On the one hand, international water disputes may arise due to water scarcity, and augmentation mitigates scarcity. On the other hand, wealthy nations may secure increased water supplies through technological innovations while externalizing the costs of those innovations to poorer nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Rhett B. Larson, 2016. "Governing water augmentation under the Watercourse Convention," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 866-882, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rwinxx:v:41:y:2016:i:6:p:866-882
    DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2016.1214893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02508060.2016.1214893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02508060.2016.1214893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joyeeta Gupta & Susanne Schmeier, 2020. "Future proofing the principle of no significant harm," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 731-747, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rwinxx:v:41:y:2016:i:6:p:866-882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rwin20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.