IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rurpxx/v8y2015i1p64-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: why and how?

Author

Listed:
  • Lidewij Tummers

Abstract

The re-emergence of Co-housing matches with the current rise of 'DIY', 'Rurbanizing' and 'New Commons' trends in Western European countries. Publications and websites of co-housing networks show that the ambitions of the initiatives are very similar internationally, and there is a strong information flow between projects and crossing borders. There are often high expectations, both by inhabitants and urban policy makers about the resilience and impact of self-organized housing communities. At the same time, driving forces behind the trend are different for each country: from demographic change to land scarcity, promotion of private property, and failing housing distribution. Moreover, planning contexts vary considerably, both geographically and over time. This article searches for an interpretation of the co-housing trend through the lens of spatial planning. This article is based on collaborative research in France, Netherlands and Germany, including field experience in several other EU countries. This article argues that co-housing can only be fully understood when taking into account planning context. The relevance of self-organized housing for urban development and spatial planning lies primarily in the lessons it learns on 'participative urbanism'; both in design and management of high quality urban environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lidewij Tummers, 2015. "Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: why and how?," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 64-78, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:8:y:2015:i:1:p:64-78
    DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:8:y:2015:i:1:p:64-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rurp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.