IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rurpxx/v17y2024i1p51-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gatekeepers of local environmental progress? Self-referencing practices of urban bureaucracy

Author

Listed:
  • Renata Putkowska-Smoter
  • Mateusz Smoter
  • Krzysztof Niedziałkowski

Abstract

We argue that contemporary debate on innovative urban environmental governance underestimates the influence of bureaucratic self-referencing practices. Informed by organisational and institutional theories, we define them as mechanisms for strategic incorporation of new environmental rules while keeping former administrative structures stable. Analysis of new units in Polish cities identified three such practices: defining bureaucratic identity, translating environmental issues, and managing external actors. Thus, urban bureaucracy is ‘a gatekeeper’ that can soften or strengthen the administrative boundaries of environmental progress. We, therefore, recommend the careful evaluation of innovative administrative forms to determine whether they meet social and environmental expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata Putkowska-Smoter & Mateusz Smoter & Krzysztof Niedziałkowski, 2024. "Gatekeepers of local environmental progress? Self-referencing practices of urban bureaucracy," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 51-71, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:51-71
    DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2022.2115313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17535069.2022.2115313
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17535069.2022.2115313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rurpxx:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:51-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rurp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.