IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Something's wrong here: transnational dissent and the unimagined community

Listed author(s):
  • Brian Callan
Registered author(s):

    Based on ethnographic research in 2011-2012 this paper explores the production of a transnational community through various dissenting practices in Israel-Palestine. In a critique of instrumental and structural approaches to transnational dissent, from micro-level framing processes to the macro-level concepts like Global Civil Society (GCS) and networks, it builds understandings of the affective dimensions of protest and proposes that a transnational community is being produced through a shared feeling of wrongness . Drawing upon recent reassessments of community conceptualisations [Amit, V., & Rapport, N. (2002). The trouble with community: Anthropological reflections on movement, identity and collectivity . London: Pluto; Djelic, M.-L., & Quack, S. (Eds.). (2010a). Transnational communities: Shaping global governance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Rapport, N., & Amit, V. (2012a). Community, cosmopolitanism and the problem of human commonality (anthropology, culture and society) (Kindle.). London: Pluto Press], this paper asks why the moral actors from GCS limit their imagined community in spatial terms. In a world of movement, where the everyday practice of community is as likely to be defined through shared worldviews as it is though shared place, the challenge is to ask how we may engage in recognising and re-imagining transnational activism as not merely an episodic and instrumental gesellschaft but as a praxis of fluid, interconnected and self-reproducing gemeinschaften .

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Contemporary Social Science.

    Volume (Year): 9 (2014)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages: 106-120

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:106-120
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2013.851411
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:106-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.