IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v8y2013i3p278-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobilising knowledge in community - university partnerships: what does a community of practice approach contribute?

Author

Listed:
  • Angie Hart
  • Ceri Davies
  • Kim Aumann
  • Etienne Wenger
  • Kay Aranda
  • Becky Heaver
  • David Wolff

Abstract

Over the past decade different approaches to mobilising knowledge in Community - University Partnership (CUP) contexts have emerged in the UK. Despite this, detailed accounts of the intricate texture of these approaches, enabling others to replicate or learn from them, are lacking. This paper adds to the literature which begins to address this gap. The case considered here concentrates on one particular approach to knowledge mobilisation (KM) developed in the UK context. It provides an account of the authors' involvement in applying the concept, and practical lessons from a community of practice (CoP) approach, to developing knowledge exchange (KE) between academics, parents and practitioners. The authors' approach to KM explicitly attempts to combat power differentials between academics and community partners, and problematises knowledge power hierarchies. The paper explores the CoP concept and critically investigates key elements of relevance to developing KE in the CUP context. Specific themes addressed are those of power, participation and working across boundaries by CoP members with very different subject positions and knowledge capitals. The paper concludes that CoPs can be a useful mechanism for KM, but have many limitations depending on the specific context in which KM is being undertaken.

Suggested Citation

  • Angie Hart & Ceri Davies & Kim Aumann & Etienne Wenger & Kay Aranda & Becky Heaver & David Wolff, 2013. "Mobilising knowledge in community - university partnerships: what does a community of practice approach contribute?," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 278-291, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:278-291
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2013.767470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2013.767470
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:278-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.