IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sentencing mothers: the rights of the child and the duties of the criminal courts


  • Rona Epstein


The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) came into force in October 2000. Section 6 of the Act obliges all public bodies, including, of course, the courts, to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Article 8 of the ECHR and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) states that everyone has the right to respect for private and family life. As imprisonment of a father or a mother entails the forcible separation of a child from its parent and therefore impacts on the Article 8 rights of the child, a sentencing court must therefore conduct a balancing exercise weighing the Article 8 rights of the child against the seriousness of the parent's offence. This article reports on the research that I have undertaken to explore to what extent, if at all, the required balancing exercise is being carried out in the English sentencing courts and whether the courts are complying with the HRA in this respect. The research covered 50 cases of the imposition of custody (suspended and immediate) on mothers who have the care of a dependent child. This article presents conclusions from this preliminary study, which principally has found that although the courts do sometimes express concern for the welfare of affected children, they do not, on the whole, refer as they should to the rights of the child at the time of sentencing a mother. Although the law regarding the rights of the child to a parent's care applies equally to a father and a mother, this article concentrates on the imprisonment of mothers; in the vast majority of cases, it is the custody of the mother that results in the loss of parental care.

Suggested Citation

  • Rona Epstein, 2013. "Sentencing mothers: the rights of the child and the duties of the criminal courts," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 130-140, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:130-140
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.751503

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:130-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.