IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v18y2023i3-4p428-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

England’s catch-22: institutional limitations to achieving balanced growth through devolution

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Hoole
  • Simon Collinson
  • Jack Newman

Abstract

International studies show that relative levels of regional (de)centralisation are associated with more or less balanced patterns of economic growth, well-being and resilience. Alongside supporting specific levels and types of devolution, prior studies emphasise the quality of local institutions as a key factor underlying balanced growth. This study empirically confirms the relative lack of devolution alongside large and growing disparities across England’s regions. Drawing on an interview-based case study of the West Midlands, we then identify a Catch-22, with devolution predicated on high-quality local institutions caught in a highly centralised system that undermines the development of the required capacity and competency. We identify specific decision-making and resource allocation mechanisms, appraisal and control systems which underpin the dominance of central government agencies in an ad hoc and asymmetric approach to devolution. In combination these limit progress towards locally-driven ‘levelling-up’.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Hoole & Simon Collinson & Jack Newman, 2023. "England’s catch-22: institutional limitations to achieving balanced growth through devolution," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3-4), pages 428-448, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:18:y:2023:i:3-4:p:428-448
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2023.2203122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2023.2203122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2023.2203122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:18:y:2023:i:3-4:p:428-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.