Author
Listed:
- Amanda N. Brumwell
- Gbotemi B. Babatunde
- Sonjelle Shilton
- Jade Tso
- Michael W. Wilson
- Noeline Xulu
- Jamila K. Adam
- Monique M. Marks
- Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez
Abstract
Innovative diagnostic solutions are essential to improve COVID-19 case detection and slow its spread in resource-constrained settings. To understand how South African communities may utilise rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen self-testing and react to self-test results, we conducted a qualitative study, involving semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions, of healthcare workers, representatives of civil society groups, and potential self-testing implementors. A sex- and location-sensitive thematic analysis approach was used to assess how 52 decision-takers on self-testing roll-out in South Africa perceive the value and utility of this innovative diagnostic approach. Informants suggested South Africans might value a device that allows them to self-test in private, at their own convenience, while avoiding the risk of social stigma and having to wait for COVID-19 test results in a facility. They also emphasised the need for awareness and sensitisation campaigns and to ensure pre-/post-self-test counselling services are easily accessible. Collaboration with traditional leaders and community-based organisations would improve results communication and linkage to counselling and confirmatory testing. SARS-CoV-2 self-testing was perceived to be acceptable to a population already sensitised to the use of HIV self-testing, being a decentralised solution that would help reduce the incidence of COVID-19 and prevent any further deterioration of socio-economic indicators.
Suggested Citation
Amanda N. Brumwell & Gbotemi B. Babatunde & Sonjelle Shilton & Jade Tso & Michael W. Wilson & Noeline Xulu & Jamila K. Adam & Monique M. Marks & Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez, 2022.
"Self-testing for COVID-19 in Durban and Eastern Cape, South Africa: a qualitative inquiry targeting decision-takers,"
Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 450-467, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:17:y:2022:i:5:p:450-467
DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2022.2147986
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:17:y:2022:i:5:p:450-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.