IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v14y2019i3-4p515-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitating the voice of disabled women: the biographic narrative interpretive method (BNIM) in action

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Peta
  • Tom Wengraf
  • Judith McKenzie

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that bringing the Biographic Narrative Interpretive Method (BNIM) to disability studies, under a qualitative narrative approach, promises to further develop the field. The article shows the effectiveness of the interviewing techniques of the method in facilitating the voice of marginalised minority groups and in particular disabled women. The approach supports inclusive research which goes beyond the practice of classifying and pathologising bodies with impairments, as is common in mainstream medical research which seeks to cure, modify and normalise people who are situated as docile and ‘abnormal’ human beings. Comments that were proffered by disabled women themselves indicate that the interviewing techniques of the BNIM create a platform for those who are located at the margins of society to play an active part in the co-construction of knowledge in academic circles, in a scenario which answers the question posed by Spivak (1988). Can the subaltern speak? Marxism and the interpretation of culture. New York, NY: Columbia University Press).

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Peta & Tom Wengraf & Judith McKenzie, 2019. "Facilitating the voice of disabled women: the biographic narrative interpretive method (BNIM) in action," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3-4), pages 515-527, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:14:y:2019:i:3-4:p:515-527
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2018.1450520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2018.1450520
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2018.1450520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:14:y:2019:i:3-4:p:515-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.