IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v14y2019i2p341-360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Commonwealth: a panacea for the UK’s post-Brexit trade ills?

Author

Listed:
  • David Hearne
  • Alex De Ruyter
  • Haydn Davies

Abstract

The central tenet of this article is that geography is the dominant factor in determining trade flows. British accession to the EEC in 1973 did not cause a discernible break in export trends already visible. As a complement to the existing literature on prospects for post-Brexit trade, we consider in-depth case-studies to ascertain the extent to which a reorientation of UK trade flows towards the Commonwealth might be feasible. We consider Nigeria and India as representatives of fast-growing economies with large populations in addition to Australia and Canada as examples of more mature economies. In each case, substantial barriers towards a substantive improvement in export conditions remain. We find that plans to ‘replace’ EU trade with that from the Commonwealth are problematic. As such, this article seeks to deepen our practical understanding of barriers to trade and explain why, ultimately, geography trumps history in determining British trade flows and will continue to do so, irrespective of the UK’s future relationship with the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • David Hearne & Alex De Ruyter & Haydn Davies, 2019. "The Commonwealth: a panacea for the UK’s post-Brexit trade ills?," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 341-360, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:341-360
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2018.1558277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2018.1558277
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2018.1558277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:341-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.