IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v14y2019i2p242-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making sense of the social policy impacts of Brexit

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Hantrais
  • Kitty Stewart
  • Kerris Cooper

Abstract

When Denmark, the Republic of Ireland and the UK joined the European Communities in 1973, their governments were required to transpose into domestic law all the treaty commitments previously negotiated by the six founding member states. A chapter on social policy in the 1957 Treaty, conceptualised as a necessary component of economic integration, was designed to prevent distortion of the rules of competition and ensure a high standard of social protection for workers. Although successive UK governments strongly supported the concept of a single European market, they resisted the notion of a European ‘social superstate’ or ‘social union’. They opposed the extension of qualified majority voting to social security and favoured softer forms of social legislation to preserve national sovereignty over social protection systems. This article attempts to make sense, firstly, of the role played by the social dimension during the UK’s membership of the European Union, the referendum campaign and Brexit negotiations; and, secondly, of the direct and indirect implications of Brexit for the future development of social and employment policy in both the EU and the UK. The authors consider the implications for the EU’s social agenda, and for employment rights, public service provision and living standards in the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Hantrais & Kitty Stewart & Kerris Cooper, 2019. "Making sense of the social policy impacts of Brexit," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 242-255, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:242-255
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2019.1572217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2019.1572217
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2019.1572217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:242-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.