IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v10y2015i3p310-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Social) Death is not the end: resisting social exclusion due to suicide

Author

Listed:
  • Zohar Gazit

Abstract

In most studies on those bereaved by suicide - depicted in this article as 'suicide survivors' - the social stigma of suicide results in two options for survivors: to suffer ostracism or downplay public mention of the loss, thereby contributing to the deceased's social exclusion. I suggest a third alternative - that of contesting the social death inflicted upon both the deceased and their survivors. Various qualitative methods were used to analyse Path to Life , an Israeli association founded by bereaved families striving to redress the segregation of people who committed suicide and those who survive them. The activists use a seemingly paradoxical strategy, by which they seek to place the cause of their social death in the limelight. Through their efforts to reframe suicide from a taboo to a widespread problem deserving recognition, the organisation's activists present the deceased and their survivors as entitled to consideration and support. The proposed analysis is based on frame analysis of 'alternative death entrepreneurs' promoting unconventional perceptions and practices concerning suicide. The case study illuminates a subject seldom investigated - efforts to transform social death.

Suggested Citation

  • Zohar Gazit, 2015. "(Social) Death is not the end: resisting social exclusion due to suicide," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 310-322, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:310-322
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2015.1114662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2015.1114662
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2015.1114662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:310-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.