IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v10y2015i3p262-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social death and the moral identity of the fourth age

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Gilleard
  • Paul Higgs

Abstract

The bleaker aspects of old age have been encapsulated in the concept of a fourth age which has been likened to a metaphorical 'black hole' where human agency is no longer visible. This paper explores what such a formulation might mean for the moral standing of mentally and physically infirm persons. Does the idea of a fourth age reinforce representations of dementia as a form of social death or does the status of those defined by the moral imperative of care benefit from the narratives and practices of their carers who keep socially alive such persons whatever their degree of dementia? This paper argues that those persons at risk of being enveloped by the fourth age are not inherently deprived of a social life even if it is a social life that their previous self would not have chosen. The moral imperative of care forms a key part element of the fourth age - for both good and ill. Recognising the role of carers in realising or rejecting the fourth age imaginary means also valuing their agency.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Gilleard & Paul Higgs, 2015. "Social death and the moral identity of the fourth age," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 262-271, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:262-271
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2015.1075328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2015.1075328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2015.1075328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:262-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.