IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v10y2015i2p171-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using evidence to reconstruct second-language learning policies in Estonia

Author

Listed:
  • Tatjana Kiilo
  • Dagmar Kutsar

Abstract

This paper exploits framing analysis to examine how evidence from research and public consultations plays out in the process of public policy formation, as exemplified by the case of the Estonian Government's new integration strategy for ethnic minorities. The strategy uses 'culture steering' to address a horizontal policy area, namely second-language learning (SLL) policies for adults. The authors draw on diverse forms of evidence from contrasting ideological stances to examine how a government administration functions as a knowledge broker in a post-socialist country. They discuss the appraisal process and review various ways of framing and reframing evidence, while also exploring the potential for policy learning. The paper concludes that, when reconstructing SLL policies in Estonia, not only does the quality of the evidence assembled matter, but 'culture steering' also plays an important role by addressing possible sources of resistance to change and by managing conflicting ideological discourses.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatjana Kiilo & Dagmar Kutsar, 2015. "Using evidence to reconstruct second-language learning policies in Estonia," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 171-181, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:171-181
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2015.1061685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2015.1061685
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2015.1061685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:171-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.