IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocec/v84y2026i1p103-128.html

Social network analysis from the perspective of African political philosophy

Author

Listed:
  • Dominic Burbidge

Abstract

Social network analysis tracks the reach of human networks to understand how interpersonal interactions and relationships influence behavioural outcomes. There is great scope for research on sub-Saharan African elite politics through social network analysis, but one must also avoid an ‘off the shelf’ solution. The article engages African political philosophy to reconstruct the methodology, requiring that two assumptions be jettisoned: (1) the assumption that people necessarily choose their social networks; (2) the assumption that social networks give advantages to some people over others primarily through access to information and associated resource-based opportunities. It is instead better to see political networks in sub-Saharan Africa as primarily oriented towards reducing the risk of betrayal, with network advantage consisting in embeddedness rather than information, so as to avoid the tertius gaudens (the one who benefits when others are divided). The application of African political philosophy seeks to sharpen the method for global use.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominic Burbidge, 2026. "Social network analysis from the perspective of African political philosophy," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 84(1), pages 103-128, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:84:y:2026:i:1:p:103-128
    DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2025.2532545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00346764.2025.2532545
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00346764.2025.2532545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:84:y:2026:i:1:p:103-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.