IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocec/v83y2025i3p327-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disparity in employment in India: evidence from engineering graduates across social groups and gender

Author

Listed:
  • Arjun Prakash
  • Inder Sekhar Yadav

Abstract

The study scrutinises caste and gender disparity in shaping employment outcomes and academic performances across 1406 students from a prestigious engineering college in Kerala, India, employing logistic regression of campus recruitment data. The study reveals that students from marginalised social groups experience significantly lower placement rates and exhibit substantially lower academic performance. Even after accounting for academic differences, marginalised community students are less likely to be employed, signalling labour market bias. Males within this marginalised group face even lower placement chances. When employed, marginalised group students are less likely to be employed in high-paying jobs. Interestingly, while females are preferred over males, especially in high-paying jobs, they are underrepresented in the engineering domain, particularly in the branches that are traditionally male-dominated. The study is among the first to comprehensively examine the interplay of multiple factors – employment disparity, wage levels, academic performances, caste and gender in campus recruitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjun Prakash & Inder Sekhar Yadav, 2025. "Disparity in employment in India: evidence from engineering graduates across social groups and gender," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(3), pages 327-346, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:83:y:2025:i:3:p:327-346
    DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2024.2402321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00346764.2024.2402321
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00346764.2024.2402321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:83:y:2025:i:3:p:327-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.