IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocec/v78y2020i1p35-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

History vs. equilibrium one more time: how Keynes’s General Theory foundered on the rocks of comparative statics

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen A. Marglin

Abstract

Keynes’s message, that full employment was an unlikely outcome for a capitalist economy, did not survive scrutiny in a comparative-statics framework. But this was the fault of the framework, not the message. The main criticisms leveled at the idea of an underemployment equilibrium were that, as the money wage rate fell, the Keynes effect would lead to an expansion of investment demand (Modigliani) and that the real-balance effect would lead to an expansion of consumption demand (Haberler and Pigou). Neither of these criticisms survives when real-time changes in the money wage replace static comparisons of equilibria with different money wages. The lesson is that dynamic adjustment is key to understanding the workings of a capitalist economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen A. Marglin, 2020. "History vs. equilibrium one more time: how Keynes’s General Theory foundered on the rocks of comparative statics," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(1), pages 35-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:78:y:2020:i:1:p:35-52
    DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2019.1636289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00346764.2019.1636289
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00346764.2019.1636289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocec:v:78:y:2020:i:1:p:35-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRSE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.