Author
Listed:
- Brian P. McCullough
- Galen Trail
- Timothy Kellison
- Jessica R. Murfree
Abstract
Negative fan responses to social messages reinforce sport practitioners’ reluctance to implement and engage external stakeholders in environmental messaging out of fear of backlash. Drawing from the Sport Sustainability Campaign Evaluation Model (SSCEM) and its extended version (eSSCEM), we aim to empirically understand how consumers react to environmental messages. Specifically, the objectives of this paper are threefold: (1) Incorporate aspects of the SSCEM (internal constraints) and pre-existing perceptions of the importance of acting sustainably excluded from prior research into the extension; (2) Include two new KPIs specific to the sport organization (a stronger connection to the sport organization or supporting the sport organization less); and (3) Test the moderating effects of environmentalism identification on the model to determine whether environmentalism impacted the relationships within the model suggesting potential market segments. We use data from a sample of 429 NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision team ticket purchasers to show that fans’ receptivity to environmental sustainability messages impacts their connection with the organization and future support. The perceived fit between environmental sustainability and the organization strongly influences receptivity. Environmentalism identification moderates these relationships to some extent, indicating differing fan responses to sustainability efforts. The study’s results underscore the importance of sport organizations’ effective communication of sustainability efforts to elicit positive fan responses and strengthen connections to the team.
Suggested Citation
Brian P. McCullough & Galen Trail & Timothy Kellison & Jessica R. Murfree, 2025.
"The role of identity on receptivity to environmental messaging and its impact on fandom,"
Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 770-795, August.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:770-795
DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2025.2511500
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:770-795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.