IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v28y2025i2p328-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Game day guilt: how ingroup affiliation and identity threat influence indulgent food choices among sport fans

Author

Listed:
  • Yonghwan Chang
  • Taewoong Yoo
  • Clinton Warren
  • Daniel L. Wann

Abstract

This research investigates the extent to which ingroup-related cues can reduce anticipatory guilt associated with indulgent foods and examines the mechanisms behind this reduction. In two experiments, participants were shown images of unhealthy foods against either a neutral grey background (control) or a background featuring their university/team colors (team color foods). Experiment 1, conducted online, found that exposure to team color foods reduced guilt, leading to an increased preference for unhealthy foods. However, Experiment 2, conducted in a lab setting, revealed that this effect diminished when participants experienced an identity threat, resulting in decreased preferences for unhealthy foods. These findings suggest that ingroup cues subtly encourage unhealthy food consumption among sport fans. These findings offer valuable insights for sport marketers and policymakers on the role of group cues, emphasizing the need for careful consideration when integrating such cues in health promotion campaigns, given their potential to unintentionally promote unhealthy behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Yonghwan Chang & Taewoong Yoo & Clinton Warren & Daniel L. Wann, 2025. "Game day guilt: how ingroup affiliation and identity threat influence indulgent food choices among sport fans," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 328-347, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:328-347
    DOI: 10.1080/14413523.2024.2436713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14413523.2024.2436713
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14413523.2024.2436713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:328-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.