IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v24y2021i3p389-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reviewing evidence of LGBTQ+ discrimination and exclusion in sport

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Denison
  • Nadia Bevan
  • Ruth Jeanes

Abstract

Sport organisations continue to place a low priority on addressing the exclusion and discrimination experienced by LGBTQ+ people (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, questioning/queer, and sexual/gender diverse). It was previously thought this was due to a lack of quantitative evidence of a problem; however, over the past decade, a large body of quantitative research has been conducted, including two international studies, providing strong evidence that discriminatory behaviour remains common in sport and is harmful to this population. In this paper, the authors summarise existing quantitative evidence and consider why sport organisations continue to be slow to address LGBTQ+ exclusion. They argue sport management scholars are in a unique and privileged position to address current resistance to action and drive change through conducting research aimed at identifying pragmatic, practical approaches to end harmful discriminatory behaviours. Finally, the authors describe why such research has the potential to mitigate harm while also advancing the discipline in ways described as being needed by leading scholars.There is strong evidence that LGBTQ+ people experience discrimination in sport.Sport managers remain resistant to addressing the harm caused to this community.Solution-focused research is needed to identify ways to overcome this resistance.Sport management scholars are in a privileged position to lead these investigations.Leading this research could mitigate harm while helping to advance the discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Denison & Nadia Bevan & Ruth Jeanes, 2021. "Reviewing evidence of LGBTQ+ discrimination and exclusion in sport," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 389-409, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:389-409
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2020.09.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2020.09.003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2020.09.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:24:y:2021:i:3:p:389-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.