IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v22y2019i5p571-583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward an institutional theory of escalation of commitment within sport management: A review and future directions

Author

Listed:
  • Calvin Nite
  • Michael Hutchinson
  • Adrien Bouchet

Abstract

•Escalation of commitment theory in sport has grown over the past decade.•Escalation of commitment research has traditionally relied on fiscal indicators.•Sport contexts have shown that institutional factors should be considered.•EoC research should account for institutional structures and logics.Over the past decade, escalation of commitment theory has gained traction and relevance in the sport management literature. The purpose of this paper was to review the current progress of escalation of commitment research within sport management and provide a new perspective for evaluating and researching potential cases of escalation within sport contexts. To this end, the authors proposed a model that accounts for the different institutional logics that likely impact decision-making and evaluations of success. Consistent with previous research of institutions, the authors contend that the perceptions and attached meanings to courses of action should be accounted for when examining escalation of commitment. The implications of this approach and how it addresses shortcomings of previous research are detailed. Finally, the authors provide suggestions for future research of escalation of commitment in sport contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Calvin Nite & Michael Hutchinson & Adrien Bouchet, 2019. "Toward an institutional theory of escalation of commitment within sport management: A review and future directions," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 571-583, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:22:y:2019:i:5:p:571-583
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2019.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2019.01.006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2019.01.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:22:y:2019:i:5:p:571-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.