IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v19y2016i4p417-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges for sport development: Women's entry level cycling participation

Author

Listed:
  • Katie Rowe
  • David Shilbury
  • Lesley Ferkins
  • Erica Hinckson

Abstract

•Participation is identified as a complex concept that spans several disciplines.•Principles of social ecological theory and sport development guide the study.•Explores perceived cycling motivations, supports and constraints of beginner females.•Identified motivations and barriers provide insights for stakeholders.•Further research is needed to inform strategies to address gender disparity in cycling.Sport participation is an issue of relevance to sport managers, yet it is an often-neglected area of sport management research. Cycling is a particularly complex form of participation to examine given its many formats, including sport, recreational and commuter cycling, and the multifaceted nature of the cycling landscape involving a broad range of stakeholders. In Australia, women are underrepresented in cycling participation and membership (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012; Cycling Australia, 2014), yet women show an interest in cycling training courses. The present paper explores motivations, supports and constraints reported by a group of entry-level female cyclists who participated in a training programme accredited by AustCycle, an initiative led by Cycling Australia. We draw on a health and sport development driven framework, informed by social ecological theory (Rowe et al., 2013), and suited to examining the issue of women's cycling participation in Australia. Results show that a range of individual characteristics, and factors within the social and physical environment, were perceived by study participants as barriers to participation. Of these, skill level, confidence, traffic/road conditions, and social support networks held particular relevance. Participants also discussed specific cycling barriers and supports of relevance to certain forms of cycling. Preliminary insights into perceptions held by a group of entry-level female cyclists highlight overlaps between cycling formats and indicate that conceptual advancements in the development of sport, and development through sport could be collectively considered in the context of women's cycling participation. Further research opportunities were also identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie Rowe & David Shilbury & Lesley Ferkins & Erica Hinckson, 2016. "Challenges for sport development: Women's entry level cycling participation," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 417-430, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:19:y:2016:i:4:p:417-430
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2015.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2015.11.001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2015.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Carlos Guevara-Pérez & Jorge Rojo-Ramos & Rudemarlyn Urdaneta-Camacho & Emilio Martín Vallespín, 2022. "Raiders of the Olympic Values: Perception of the Development of Women’s Canoeing in Spain for Tokyo 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Olaia Eizagirre-Sagastibeltza & Uxue Fernandez-Lasa & Javier Yanci & Estibaliz Romaratezabala & Ruth Cayero & Iñaki Iturrioz & Oidui Usabiaga, 2022. "Design and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Leisure Time Physical Activity of Adult Women in Gipuzkoa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:19:y:2016:i:4:p:417-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.