IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v49y2025i1p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the Symmetric GARCH model across different sample sizes

Author

Listed:
  • M. A. Purchase
  • H. Viljoen
  • W. J. Conradie

Abstract

In the world of econometrics, the GARCH model has the desired ability to model the changing variance (heteroskedasticity) of a financial time series. Therefore, the primary goal of this paper is to investigate changes in volatility, parameter estimates and forecasting error across different window lengths as this may indicate an appropriate sample size to use when fitting an S-GARCH model. After examining the 6489 1-day log-returns on the FTSE/JSE-ALSI between 27 December 1995 and 15 December 2021, an average estimate for volatility of 0.193 670 was calculated. Furthermore, given that the rolling window methodology was applied across 20 different window lengths, a total of 90 000 S-GARCH models were fit to the data. Among others, key results include volatility estimates across most window lengths taking longer to settle after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) than after the COVID-19 pandemic. In terms of parameter estimates, values for α and β under a window length of 100 trading days were often calculated infinitely close to zero and one respectively, indicating a strong possibility of the optimising algorithm arriving at local maxima of the likelihood function. With the exceptionally low p-values under the Jarque-Bera and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, substantial motivation was provided for the use of the Student's t-distribution when fitting GARCH models. Given the results obtained, it is clear that a window length between 100 and 500 can produce fitted models that are unstable and that a window length between 1000 and 2000 may be too large to account for market shocks.

Suggested Citation

  • M. A. Purchase & H. Viljoen & W. J. Conradie, 2025. "Analysing the Symmetric GARCH model across different sample sizes," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1080/03796205.2024.2439099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03796205.2024.2439099
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03796205.2024.2439099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:49:y:2025:i:1:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.