IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v40y2016i2p53-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Note on the Predictive Power of the Variance Risk Premium: South African Evidence Benchmarked Against the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Gopi
  • D. Bradfield

Abstract

Recent international evidence on the Variance Risk Premium, defined as the difference between implied and realised return variation, shows that this metric has predictive power in forecasting aggregate stock market returns. This evidence seems to be strongest for the US market. In this article we conduct a study on the ability of the Variance Risk Premium to predict aggregate stock returns for both the US market and the South African market, allowing us to contrast our South African results against the US. Our empirical study using US data confirms the predictive power of the Variance Risk Premium in the US market. The evidence from our empirical study in the South African market however reveals little or no predictive power of South African market returns, even when combined with typical economic predictor variables. Thus the use of a South African Variance Risk Premium for predictive purposes in the South African environment is currently not supported by this research. Our analysis does however suggest that the US VRP does have some predictive power for the SA stock market, but that this relationship is period dependent and might not persist into the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Gopi & D. Bradfield, 2016. "A Note on the Predictive Power of the Variance Risk Premium: South African Evidence Benchmarked Against the USA," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 53-70, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:40:y:2016:i:2:p:53-70
    DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2016.12097297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10800379.2016.12097297
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10800379.2016.12097297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:40:y:2016:i:2:p:53-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.