IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v38y2014i2p33-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Market Fragility Using the Absorption Ratio

Author

Listed:
  • D. Bradfield
  • D Hendricks

Abstract

The objective of this report is to introduce a measure called the absorption ratio, for monitoring systemic risk in the South African environment. We follow an academic paper by Kritzman, Li, Page and Rigobon (2011) who proposed this metric. The measure is intended to signal when the market is becoming highly fragile because risk is beginning to concentrate in a narrow direction. We extend these ideas to measure the systemic risk of an individual portfolio.The absorption ratio is essentially the fraction of a set of assets’ total variance ‘absorbed’ by a fixed number of risk factors. A high absorption ratio suggests the risk in the market is beginning to concentrate, making it vulnerable to a narrow negative shock. Our empirical analysis assesses an equity market environment and a typical local portfolio. The evidence in both cases shows there was an increase in the absorption ratio prior to significant losses in the market. Interestingly, the results also show that, subsequent to the 2008 crash, the absorption ratio remained at relatively high levels, indicating that the market remained fragile and vulnerable to any further narrow shocks - but that perhaps bail-outs averted any further shocks.Our results using both data sets thus confirm the usefulness of the absorption ratio as a signalling metric of rising systemic risk in the South African environment.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Bradfield & D Hendricks, 2014. "Monitoring Market Fragility Using the Absorption Ratio," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 33-46, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:38:y:2014:i:2:p:33-46
    DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2014.12097266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10800379.2014.12097266
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10800379.2014.12097266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:38:y:2014:i:2:p:33-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.