IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v37y2013i3p1-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Accurate are South African Macroeconomic Forecasts?

Author

Listed:
  • C P van Walbeek

Abstract

This paper considers the ex post accuracy of two published sets of macroeconomic forecasts: the Economist Intelligence Unit’s (EIU’s) Country Report and the “Economist of the Year” consensus forecast, sponsored by Media 24. Root weighted mean square errors (RWMSEs) of these two competing entities’ forecasts are, on average, about 60% of the RWMSEs of adaptive naïve predictions for current-year forecasts and about 75% of the RWMSEs of adaptive naïve predictions for one- year-ahead forecasts. There is no substantial difference in the forecast accuracy of the two entities, despite large differences in forecasting methodology. Forecasts are revised on a monthly basis. Monthly revisions in Media 24’s consensus forecast are substantially more likely to reduce forecast errors than the EIU’s monthly forecast revisions. Revisions in the next-year forecasts for GDP growth and inflation are only marginally better than random, and thus such revisions have little credibility.

Suggested Citation

  • C P van Walbeek, 2013. "How Accurate are South African Macroeconomic Forecasts?," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:37:y:2013:i:3:p:1-24
    DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2013.12097255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10800379.2013.12097255
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10800379.2013.12097255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:37:y:2013:i:3:p:1-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.