IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v30y2006i2p41-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further Extensions Of The Ekop Model

Author

Listed:
  • J H Venter
  • D C J de Jongh

Abstract

Easley, Kiefer, O'Hara and Paperman (1996) introduced a model that enables one to estimate the probability of informed trading in a stock using as input data the numbers of buyer and seller initiated trades over a period. Empirical testing reported in Venter and de Jongh (2006) indicated that this model does not fit data well and they formulated a model based on the Poisson Inverse Gaussian (PIG) distribution that fitted better. This model allowed for random daily news noise impacts on the trading intensities of the liquidity and informed traders. These news noise impacts were assumed to be independent over successive days. Further investigation of the model indicated that the independence assumption may not be realistic. In this paper we reformulate the model in terms of Poisson Log Normally (PLN) distributed news noise impacts with serial correlation. We show how the much more complicated likelihood function and other items of interest for inference purposes may be computed by means of efficient importance sampling.

Suggested Citation

  • J H Venter & D C J de Jongh, 2006. "Further Extensions Of The Ekop Model," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 41-59, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:30:y:2006:i:2:p:41-59
    DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2006.12106407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10800379.2006.12106407
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10800379.2006.12106407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:30:y:2006:i:2:p:41-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.