IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v30y2006i2p147-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergence, Rationality and Accuracy in South African Consensus Economic Forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • N L Samouilhan
  • C P van Walbeek
  • E vd M Smit

Abstract

The average values of numerous forecasts about South African economic variables are often calculated to give a summary measure of all the various forecasters' views. This mean forecast, often termed the consensus forecast, is found to increasingly represent the information held by forecasters as the forecast horizon declines. The forecasts of Inflation and GDP growth rates are investigated in this paper. The mean forecast is found to systematically underpredict large actual outcomes and overpredict low actual outcomes at long forecast horizons, with the opposite behaviour being found at short horizons. Both mean forecasts are found to be Muthian rational at all horizons. Forecasts of growth in GDP become more accurate as the forecast horizon declines, although not monotonically. Forecasts of inflation do become monotonically more accurate. The mean forecast is shown to be more accurate at all horizons compared to two extrapolation models. No relationship is found between the degree of dispersion of the forecasts around the mean and the means's accuracy for forecasts of both GDP growth and inflation.

Suggested Citation

  • N L Samouilhan & C P van Walbeek & E vd M Smit, 2006. "Convergence, Rationality and Accuracy in South African Consensus Economic Forecasts," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 147-165, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:30:y:2006:i:2:p:147-165
    DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2006.12106412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10800379.2006.12106412
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10800379.2006.12106412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:30:y:2006:i:2:p:147-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.