IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rseexx/v28y2004i3p27-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unit Root Testing Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimators: Finite- Sample Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • S Cook
  • N Manning

Abstract

Based upon Monte Carlo experiments mimicking cross-sectional analysis, Long and Ervin (2000) have suggested the routine application of heteroscedasticity consistent covariance matrix (HCCM) estimators, irrespective of whether heteroscedasticity is detected or expected. In this paper the use of HCCM estimators is re-examined in the context of testing the unit root hypothesis. The properties of Dickey-Fuller tests based on alternative HCCM estimators are considered in the presence of innovation variance breaks and heteroscedasticity in the square root of a regressor variable. The results show that for variance breaks, size correction comes at the expense of dramatic reduction in power. When heteroscedasticity is related to the square root of the lagged level in a Dickey-Fuller regression, the test does not have nominal size when the covariance matrix is either conventional or heteroscedasticity consistent. Furthermore, when HCCM estimators are used, the resultant tests can be expected to possess very little power against the null in most practical applications. Throughout, the more favoured HCCM estimator is subject to the greatest loss in power.

Suggested Citation

  • S Cook & N Manning, 2004. "Unit Root Testing Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimators: Finite- Sample Evidence," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 27-41, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:28:y:2004:i:3:p:27-41
    DOI: 10.1080/10800379.2004.12106371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10800379.2004.12106371
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10800379.2004.12106371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rseexx:v:28:y:2004:i:3:p:27-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsee .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.