Author
Abstract
PurposeTo determine business owners’ perceptions of and support for a national tax lottery system in South Africa.MotivationTax compliance in developing countries is a challenge for governments, which depend on tax revenue to provide public goods and services. A tax lottery system has been recommended for South Africa, where customers would demand receipts for purchases that serve as lottery tickets and create paper trails that would expose tax non-compliant businesses. Literature indicates that small businesses find the process burdensome, costly, and detrimental to competitiveness and growth, particularly when customers are lost to larger businesses that are better equipped to routinely supply receipts.DesignAn exploratory approach, using an online survey of suppliers to gauge their perceptions of a South African tax lottery system was followed.FindingsOf the respondent, 51% expressed support for a tax lottery system, and thus, at an exploratory level, business owners in South Africa do not seem to support a tax lottery. This is an important finding, since suppliers play an integral role in the implementation of a tax lottery system. Further research should be conducted to determine the views of a more representative sample of suppliers, to determine whether they would play their part in administering such a system. Suppliers’ biggest concern was government corruption in implementing such a system.ContributionThis study contributes to the body of knowledge on tax lotteries, particularly from a developing country perspective; furthermore, few empirical studies take the supplier perspective and acceptance of a tax lottery into account.
Suggested Citation
Anculien Schoeman, 2025.
"An exploratory study on supplier acceptance of and engagement in a national tax lottery designed to improve tax compliance,"
South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 128-148, May.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:128-148
DOI: 10.1080/10291954.2024.2393913
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:128-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.