IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsarxx/v13y1999i2p77-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of rights on the JSE

Author

Listed:
  • R Alston
  • E Uliana

Abstract

As a result of Johannesburg Stock Exchange regulations, the majority of equity issues are by rights issue. The objective of this study is to establish whether the South African market for rights issues is efficient. Using the Black-Scholes model, theoretical rights pricing boundaries were tested, and actual rights prices compared to model prices. Dilution adjusted and unadjusted model prices were calculated using historical standard deviation and implied standard deviation measures of volatility. Results showed inefficiencies associated with the lower boundary condition. The results for daily and per issue pricing indicate significant overpricing. Additional findings are that the dilution adjustment is required and the implied standard deviation is a better measure of volatility than the historical standard deviation.

Suggested Citation

  • R Alston & E Uliana, 1999. "The Efficiency of rights on the JSE," South African Journal of Accounting Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 77-97, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:13:y:1999:i:2:p:77-97
    DOI: 10.1080/10291954.1999.11435089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10291954.1999.11435089
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10291954.1999.11435089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsarxx:v:13:y:1999:i:2:p:77-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsar .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.