IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v7y2002i2p99-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Shadow of Managed Competition: Lessons From The MSW Managerial Reform In Indianapolis

Author

Listed:
  • T. J. Lah

Abstract

Indianapolis has recently gone through an innovation in municipal solid waste management, known as managed competition which opened the trash collection to competitive bidding by both public and private service providers. This study asks whether this competitive approach reflects true innovation. This paper argues that there are problems associated with the managed competition system. Findings include: i) The enormous success may not be as large as it seems due to the measurement errors; ii) The process was not based on the strict bidding system but on the Request for Proposals; iii) Large numbers of city employees had to be laid-off; and iv) There are other associated problems such as vendor noncompliance and conflict between contractors. The analysis suggests that although the managed competition arrangements may appear very successful, the approach is in fact, a new way of dealing with the issue with different set of problems.

Suggested Citation

  • T. J. Lah, 2002. "The Shadow of Managed Competition: Lessons From The MSW Managerial Reform In Indianapolis," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 99-107, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:7:y:2002:i:2:p:99-107
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2002.10805009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2002.10805009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2002.10805009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:7:y:2002:i:2:p:99-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.