IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v30y2025i3p272-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The UX of bureaucracy: mapping user engagement to citizen experiences of administrative burdens

Author

Listed:
  • Kayla Schwoerer

Abstract

Digitalization efforts have transformed how governments engage with citizens. While digital tools offer efficiency gains and improved access to public services, poor interface design often introduces new administrative burdens, undermines service quality, and eventually erodes public trust. To understand this tradeoff, this article presents an integrated conceptual framework that bridges administrative burden theory with user engagement research from human-computer interaction (HCI) studies. Specifically, it maps learning, compliance, and psychological costs onto cognitive, behavioral, and affective dimensions of user engagement. This mapping reveals how appropriately leveraged user experience (UX) design principles can reduce burdens and improve equity in digital public service delivery. Ultimately, the proposed framework emphasizes that interface design is not merely a technical matter but a matter of enacting public values. Thus, I conclude with a discussion of important ethical considerations and practical guidance for designing inclusive digital platforms and services in the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Kayla Schwoerer, 2025. "The UX of bureaucracy: mapping user engagement to citizen experiences of administrative burdens," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 272-295, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:30:y:2025:i:3:p:272-295
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2025.2535772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2025.2535772
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2025.2535772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:30:y:2025:i:3:p:272-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.