IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v30y2025i2p91-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two heads are better than one even within government bureaucracy: how does an inter-departmental network evolve?

Author

Listed:
  • Hanchan Hwang

Abstract

Inter-departmental collaborative networks can contribute to creative ideas, spanning and crossing solid boundaries resulting from formal specialization and departmentalization. This study gives an opportunity to understand how inter-departmental collaborative networks can be formed and persisted. Even though ties among government departments appeared to be influenced by vertical functional coordination, building mechanisms of bonding and bridging nature of networks can still work within government bureaucracy like other networks. Thus this study explores how an inter-departmental collaborative network is formed and persisted, adopting the structural temporal exponential random graph model (STERGM). Findings show that bonding networks serve to elucidate the mechanisms through which actors maintain existing relationships, whereas bridging networks helps to explicate the processes that underlie the identification of new collaboration partners. It is suggested that bonding and bridging networks might seem contradictory at first glance but rather complementary.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanchan Hwang, 2025. "Two heads are better than one even within government bureaucracy: how does an inter-departmental network evolve?," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 91-112, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:91-112
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2025.2457175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2025.2457175
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2025.2457175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:30:y:2025:i:2:p:91-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.