IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v24y2019i2p67-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The implementation of accrual basis accounting by Indonesia’s local governments

Author

Listed:
  • Retno Yuliati
  • Yuliansyah Yuliansyah
  • Yang Elvi Adelina

Abstract

To examine the implementation of accrual basis accounting by local governments in Indonesia following its mandatory introduction by Government Regulation (GR) Number 71 of 2010, we identify key actors in the process. Local governments earn either a ‘qualified opinion’ or an ‘unqualified opinion’ in audited financial report. They all state that the implementation of the accrual basis accounting in their governments is limited to the production of accrual accounting reports only. The process itself is not accrual-based, even four years after its mandatory implementation. Technical issues, such as imprecise valuations and shortages of qualified staff, plague governments regardless of their qualified or unqualified rating. Given that only 16 officials from nine local governments are interviewed and given that neither BPK auditors nor the local auditors are interviewed on the progress made by local governments in implementing the accrual basis accounting, the results of this study cannot be generalized. Indonesia joins other countries in accepting accrual basis accounting. Little or no research looks at the progress since 2015. We do that, and we compare the progress made by the governments earning unqualified opinion rating with that made by the governments earning qualified opinion.

Suggested Citation

  • Retno Yuliati & Yuliansyah Yuliansyah & Yang Elvi Adelina, 2019. "The implementation of accrual basis accounting by Indonesia’s local governments," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 67-80, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:24:y:2019:i:2:p:67-80
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2019.1603954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2019.1603954
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2019.1603954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:24:y:2019:i:2:p:67-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.