IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v18y2013i3p69-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accountability and Transparency in the German Nonprofit Sector: A Paradox?

Author

Listed:
  • Helmut K. Anheier
  • Rabea Hass
  • Annelie Beller

Abstract

The article draws on exploratory research on the accountability and transparency of nonprofit organizations, using Germany as an example. In terms of accountability and transparency requirements, so frequently put forth and debated in the U.S., the UK, and other countries where nonprofits play major roles in social service delivery and public sector reform, the German case presents somewhat of a puzzle: while nonprofits account indeed for a sizable share of social service delivery, and while some of the world´s largest nonprofit conglomerates are in Germany, initial findings suggest an apparent “non-problem.” Both accountability and transparency requirements in the German nonprofit sector are rather low and largely part of formalistic reporting to tax authorities. What is more, there is a general paucity of available information on nonprofit organizations, combined with low levels of awareness among stakeholders as to potential accountability and transparency problems, and a lack of political will among nonprofit representatives and policymakers to change the status quo. In conclusion, we propose five theses to help explain this seeming paradox.

Suggested Citation

  • Helmut K. Anheier & Rabea Hass & Annelie Beller, 2013. "Accountability and Transparency in the German Nonprofit Sector: A Paradox?," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 69-84, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:18:y:2013:i:3:p:69-84
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2013.10805264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2013.10805264
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2013.10805264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:18:y:2013:i:3:p:69-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.