IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rrpaxx/v13y2009i0p13-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Everyone will Get Better Together: How those Responsible for California’s Bay-Delta Water System Understand Collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Moody

Abstract

This paper examines how a variety of stakeholders and agency officials involved in collaborative governance and policymaking for California’s Bay-Delta water system understand and express the meanings, features, and benefits of collaboration. California’s water supply system is essential to the large, heavily populated state. It is centered on the “Bay-Delta” estuary, the primary source of urban and agricultural water that is now recognized as an endangered ecosystem. Data from a multi-year and multi-method qualitative research project were used to identify the repertoire of meanings of “collaboration” held by diverse participants, across settings and over time. Participants shared many core understandings of collaboration, including a strongly positive view and a pragmatic justification of collaboration as the best way to achieve workable, consensus-based solutions to Bay-Delta problems. Participants also considered “getting everyone at the table” as key to collaboration, and saw collaboration as creating familiarity, trusting relationships, and shared understandings that had practical benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Moody, 2009. "Everyone will Get Better Together: How those Responsible for California’s Bay-Delta Water System Understand Collaboration," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(0), pages 13-32, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:13:y:2009:i:0:p:13-32
    DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2009.10805137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12294659.2009.10805137
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12294659.2009.10805137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rrpaxx:v:13:y:2009:i:0:p:13-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RRPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.