IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v33y2026i3p1420-1450.html

Enter the trade war? European public opinion on trade restrictions against China

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Dotzauer
  • Paul Meiners

Abstract

This paper investigates how geopolitical factors shape individual preferences for export controls, focusing on EU–China trade in high-technology sectors. Supporters of a tougher stance toward China frequently use arguments about national security and economic containment. We examine how these arguments affect public opinion in European countries. We hypothesize that people display greater support for trade restrictions when the decision is motivated by security concerns rather than by the desire to slow China’s economic rise. We further argue that public support decreases if the economic costs of the decision are high. We test our theoretical expectations using a survey experiment with 8,770 respondents in five European countries: France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Sweden. Only a third of respondents support trade restrictions overall. Contrary to our theoretical expectations, security and economic containment frames generate similar levels of support. Our findings further indicate that citizens’ support declines as the costs to their country increase. These results advance our understanding of how geopolitical considerations shape trade attitudes by demonstrating the interaction of material and geopolitical factors. They suggest that domestic constituencies in Europe are not overly concerned about China’s rise and do not endorse a strategy of economic coercion.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Dotzauer & Paul Meiners, 2026. "Enter the trade war? European public opinion on trade restrictions against China," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 1420-1450, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:1420-1450
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2026.2631763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2026.2631763
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2026.2631763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:1420-1450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.