IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v33y2026i2p852-884.html

The rise and fall of economic coalitions in the Belt and Road Initiative: case study of a flagship project in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Keren Zhu

Abstract

China has financed and constructed infrastructure projects in over 100 countries, profoundly impacting host countries’ economic growth and political dynamics. Contrary to the initial warm embrace from host countries, many of these projects face severe pushback and unintended consequences. Why do infrastructure projects elicit diverse responses over their course of development? Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), this article traces the formation and fragmentation of economic coalitions in the China-financed and -constructed Kenyan Standard Gauge Railway, a Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) flagship project. The convergence of Chinese and host country interests contributed to government and community coalition support for project development. Yet these coalitions fluctuate with interest redistribution, creating a contrast between official discourse about infrastructure development and actual development outcomes, thus resulting in wavering subnational support. They add uncertainty to project sustainability and create a dilemma for infrastructure-led development efforts such as the BRI. My detailed documentation of the changing host country stakeholder dynamics offers a nuanced perspective on China’s influence on the Global South’s subnational and community political economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Keren Zhu, 2026. "The rise and fall of economic coalitions in the Belt and Road Initiative: case study of a flagship project in Kenya," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 852-884, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:852-884
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2025.2570284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2025.2570284
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2025.2570284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:852-884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.