IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v32y2025i5p1712-1730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a theory of ‘Big plastic’

Author

Listed:
  • Babet De Groot
  • Robert MacNeil

Abstract

This paper aims to shed light on the nature of the plastic industry’s political power by developing the concept of Big Plastic. To date, the nascent field of ‘plastic political economy’ has shied away from engaging fully with this neologism, typically using it as a throwaway term to note the sector’s influence over governments, or simply rejecting it, noting that the disaggregated nature of the plastics supply chain means that the industry cannot be understood as a monopolised juggernaut similar to Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Tech, or other highly consolidated sectors that have been assigned this descriptor. In contrast, we argue that, properly understood, the concept has significant value in helping international political economy (IPE) scholars and environmentalists understand the nature of the industry’s power, and how it might be challenged. Drawing on Fuch’s (2007) ‘three faces of business power’ framework, we sketch a picture of an industry which, despite its heterogeneous supply chain, nevertheless acts to a considerable degree as a coherent political force, leveraging its extensive power at a structural, discursive, and instrumental level to defend the continuity of unmitigated plastic production and consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Babet De Groot & Robert MacNeil, 2025. "Towards a theory of ‘Big plastic’," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 1712-1730, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:1712-1730
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2025.2498424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2025.2498424
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2025.2498424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:1712-1730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.