Author
Listed:
- Eugénia C. Heldt
- Henning Schmidtke
- Omar Serrano Oswald
Abstract
China’s engagement with multilateral economic institutions is neither fully supportive nor outright revisionist. While it supports institutions like the World Trade Organization and contributes to multilateral development banks, it also challenges aspects of the global economic order by withholding lending data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and bypassing the Paris Club. To capture this complexity, we introduce a framework that categorises China’s multilateral strategies into four types: Deep cooperation, shallow support, deep challenge, and shallow resistance. We argue that China’s strategic choices are shaped by three key factors: Domestic preferences, domestic capabilities, and the broader international strategic environment. These factors not only influence China’s engagement individually but also interact with each other, shaping its evolving multilateral strategies. Drawing on case studies from this special issue, we illustrate how China selectively supports or resists multilateral institutions across multiple issue areas—including global finance, multilateral development finance, and trade—depending on issue-area dynamics, domestic bureaucratic competition, and global power shifts. Rather than adopting a fixed position as a status quo power or a revisionist challenger, China pursues an à la carte approach to multilateralism—embracing cooperation where it aligns with national interests, resisting constraints when necessary, and even creating alternative institutions when opportunities arise. By offering a structured way to analyse these varied strategies, this framework provides insights into China’s broader role in multilateral economic governance and its implications for the future of multilateralism.
Suggested Citation
Eugénia C. Heldt & Henning Schmidtke & Omar Serrano Oswald, 2025.
"Multilateralism à la carte: how China navigates global economic institutions,"
Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 899-921, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:899-921
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2025.2495694
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:899-921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.