IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v32y2025i3p766-789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lost principles of a ‘sustainable developmentalism’

Author

Listed:
  • Baptiste Albertone

Abstract

This article discusses the advent, in the 1970s and early 1980s, of a critical turn in developmentalist thinking. This ideational shift was defined by the aspiration of classical development scholars to identify the conditions of possibility for ecologically sustainable and emancipatory forms of development in the periphery. Notably, it resulted in the formulation of Ignacy Sachs’s concept of eco-development—i.e. the developmentalist precursor to the notion of sustainable development. More than a simple effort to add an environmental dimension to development theory, eco-development expressed the search for another development, endogenous rather than mimetic, and oriented towards human needs. As such, it converged with the attempts of other major figures of classical development theory, such as Raúl Prebisch and Celso Furtado, to radically reconsider, over the same period, the nature of the transformations needed in the periphery. These contributions, however, have largely been forgotten, and their potential for critically thinking about development in the Anthropocene remains untapped. This article recovers the main conceptual innovations of this moment of theoretical transformation and argues that they formed the foundations of a sustainable developmentalism: an approach to sustainable development from and for the global periphery.

Suggested Citation

  • Baptiste Albertone, 2025. "Lost principles of a ‘sustainable developmentalism’," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 766-789, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:766-789
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2024.2447735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2024.2447735
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2024.2447735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:766-789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.