IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v32y2025i3p714-740.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The fragility of depoliticization: revisiting the history of Central bank inflation-management

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline Best

Abstract

In recent years, it has sometimes seemed like the fate of economic depoliticization is up for grabs: the 2008 global financial crisis raised serious questions about the economic viability of technocratic economic strategies while the rise of populist parties has challenged their political sustainability. Even central banks, once the priests of economic depoliticization, began to waver by the early 2020s, paying some attention to inequality and climate change. Yet, as inflation picked up after 2022, central banks returned to their old depoliticizing strategies, reimposing strict inflation targets. As we watch central bankers outdo each other as monetary hawks, we may be tempted to see the return to depoliticization as natural and inevitable. This paper paints a different picture, showing that policies aimed at depoliticizing monetary policy have encountered as many failures as successes since the early 1980s. Drawing on recently declassified archival material, it examines three attempts to put depoliticized monetary policy into practice in the UK, seeking to understand why depoliticization failed so many times and then succeeded. If attempts to depoliticize monetary policy have had a rockier history than is generally assumed, the era of successful monetary depoliticization was not only surprisingly brief but may well be over.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline Best, 2025. "The fragility of depoliticization: revisiting the history of Central bank inflation-management," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 714-740, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:714-740
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2024.2444365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2024.2444365
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2024.2444365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:714-740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.