IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v30y2023i4p1535-1559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Company colonies and historical layering: understanding the Virginia, Somers Isles, and Hudson’s Bay Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Heather Whiteside

Abstract

This paper develops comparative case studies of the Virginia, Somers Isles, and Hudson’s Bay Companies’ colonies. The analysis uncovers significant historical layering through multifaceted and dynamic modes of production, class relations, corporate governance forms, land ownership schemes, and legal arrangements. Company colonies emerged as hybrid combinations of partially feudal company-owned plantations using white indentured servitude together with proto-capitalist stockholding and freehold land, nascent Black slavery, Indigenous dispossession, and illiberal legislative assemblies oriented to company prerogatives in a largely pre-Westphalian international order. Complex historical layering indicates that no single theoretical approach can fully capture all nuance; thus, the paper mobilizes its case studies to explore critical understandings of these companies through a company-state sovereignty focus, a Marxian view of privatized land and labour, and a Weberian perspective on early capitalist public-private institutional alliances. The paper concludes with connections to contemporary anti-colonial political struggles.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Whiteside, 2023. "Company colonies and historical layering: understanding the Virginia, Somers Isles, and Hudson’s Bay Companies," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 1535-1559, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:1535-1559
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2022.2120524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2022.2120524
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2022.2120524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:1535-1559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.