IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v28y2021i6p1459-1486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minsky’s moment? The rise of depoliticised Keynesianism and ideational change at the Federal Reserve after the financial crisis of 2007/08

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Levingston

Abstract

How did potentially transformative ideas about the way economies should function become enlisted in policy frameworks that produced few major changes to policy orthodoxy at the Federal Reserve after the financial crisis of 2007/08? IPE scholarship has tended to answer this question by identifying the limited purchase of Keynesian ideas in policy circles. In so doing, however, the existing literature has left unexplained the central role of Keynesianism in the Federal Reserve’s ideational framework. To fill a gap in this literature, this article argues that ideas fill different functions (cognitive and normative) in the policy process and proposes a new explanatory model, ‘depoliticised Keynesianism’, for understanding the role that Keynesian ideas played in ideational change at the Federal Reserve after the financial crisis of 2007/08. Using in-depth interviews with current and former Federal Reserve officials, and a quantitative text analysis of Federal Open Market Committee meeting transcripts between 1981 and 2014, it traces the rise of depoliticised Keynesianism to policymakers’ normative commitment to depoliticisation and a cognitive interpretation of Keynesian ideas.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Levingston, 2021. "Minsky’s moment? The rise of depoliticised Keynesianism and ideational change at the Federal Reserve after the financial crisis of 2007/08," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 1459-1486, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:1459-1486
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2020.1772848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2020.1772848
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2020.1772848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:1459-1486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.