IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v26y2019i6p1293-1310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating trade policies: the political engagement of religious actors in Costa Rica, Canada, and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Reynolds

Abstract

Trade policies have been a contested aspect of economic globalization. Concerns arise over economic outcomes, political processes, and the balance of power between states and corporations. Religious actors are rarely studied in spite of their political discourse and engagement in trade policy debates. In this paper, I examine three faith communities in the Americas that have been engaged in debates over trade policies, specifically NAFTA, CAFTA and CA4FTA. I find that the Catholic Church in Costa Rica, the Presbyterian Church in the USA, and Kairos, an ecumenical justice coalition in Canada, have all been engaged in discussion and public action surrounding trade policies. Religious values of solidarity and community have been part of the discourse of these groups as they critique market foundations. However, the groups vary in the ways they understand their role in engaging the political economy. Options vary from 1) framing policy debates within key values, 2) providing a lens with which to evaluate policy decisions and 3) taking action on behalf of an alternative economic order.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Reynolds, 2019. "Evaluating trade policies: the political engagement of religious actors in Costa Rica, Canada, and the United States," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1293-1310, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:26:y:2019:i:6:p:1293-1310
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1626258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2019.1626258
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2019.1626258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:26:y:2019:i:6:p:1293-1310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.