IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rptpxx/v21y2020i2p200-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unravelling the Concept of Social Transformation in Planning: Inclusion, Power Changes, and Political Subjectification in the Oosterweel Link Road Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabet Van Wymeersch
  • Thomas Vanoutrive
  • Stijn Oosterlynck

Abstract

This article argues that applying a polysemic understanding of the concept of ‘social transformation’, in which inclusion-, power-, and subjectification-oriented approaches to social transformation are all taken into account, provides a richer understanding of the transformative dynamics at work in contentious urban planning processes. We illustrate this argument through an empirical investigation of the transformative dynamics in the Oosterweel link road conflict in Antwerp, Belgium. In this case, citizens whose voices were treated as irrelevant presented themselves as equals, altering the symbolic order (subjectification). Through mass mobilisation and legal action, citizen movements gained enough power to form a threat to the government and its plans, forcing the government to invite these movements to the negotiation table (inclusion). The case shows that different forces of transformation intertwine and can be mutually reinforcing in contentious planning processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabet Van Wymeersch & Thomas Vanoutrive & Stijn Oosterlynck, 2020. "Unravelling the Concept of Social Transformation in Planning: Inclusion, Power Changes, and Political Subjectification in the Oosterweel Link Road Conflict," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 200-217, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:21:y:2020:i:2:p:200-217
    DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2020.1752787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14649357.2020.1752787
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14649357.2020.1752787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:21:y:2020:i:2:p:200-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rptp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.