IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rptpxx/v13y2012i4p509-527.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outcomes from Community Engagement in Urban Regeneration: Evidence from England's New Deal for Communities Programme

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Lawless
  • Sarah Pearson

Abstract

The New Deal for Communities (NDC) programme was one of the most intensive area-based initiatives (ABIs) ever launched in England. Between 1998 and 2010, 39 NDC partnerships were charged with implementing 10-year, locally informed strategies designed to improve conditions within deprived neighbourhoods each accommodating around 9,800 people. More than any other previous English ABI, the NDC programme placed a strong emphasis on informing and engaging the 39 local communities in all aspects of the regeneration process. The programme can be seen as a laboratory within which to assess relationships between community involvement in regeneration and any associated outcomes. Change data indicates that at the area-level there is nothing to suggest NDC areas saw more change than other deprived localities, or that NDCs doing more in relation to the community dimension saw greater change than those doing less. Data showing change for individuals, however, reveals that those involved in NDC activities saw more gains than those who were not involved. This positive individual-level change is not reflected in area-level data because absolute levels of involvement remained essentially low. This was for a number of reasons, some of which relate to the evolving NDC narrative: greater control from central government, diminishing community interest in the initiative, and over-optimistic assumptions on the part of local residents as to what the programme could ever achieve.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Lawless & Sarah Pearson, 2012. "Outcomes from Community Engagement in Urban Regeneration: Evidence from England's New Deal for Communities Programme," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 509-527, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:13:y:2012:i:4:p:509-527
    DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2012.728003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14649357.2012.728003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14649357.2012.728003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach & Justus Uitermark, 2018. "Exclusion as urban policy: The Dutch ‘Act on Extraordinary Measures for Urban Problems’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(11), pages 2337-2353, August.
    2. Nick Bailey & Madeleine Pill, 2015. "Can the State Empower Communities through Localism? An Evaluation of Recent Approaches to Neighbourhood Governance in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 289-304, April.
    3. Jackie Shinwell & Ellen Finlay & Caitlin Allen & Margaret Anne Defeyter, 2021. "Holiday Club Programmes in Northern Ireland: The Voices of Children and Young People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Annemarie Ruijsbroek & Albert Wong & Anton E Kunst & Carolien van den Brink & Hans A M van Oers & Mariël Droomers & Karien Stronks, 2017. "The impact of urban regeneration programmes on health and health-related behaviour: Evaluation of the Dutch District Approach 6.5 years from the start," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Aksel Ersoy, 2016. "The spread of coproduction: How the concept reached the northernmost city in the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(3), pages 410-423, May.
    6. Liz Richardson & Kingsley Purdam & Sarah Cotterill & James Rees & Graham Squires & Rebecca Askew, 2014. "Responsible Citizens and Accountable Service Providers? Renegotiating the Contract between Citizen and State," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(7), pages 1716-1731, July.
    7. Sean Bradley & Israa H. Mahmoud & Alessandro Arlati, 2022. "Integrated Collaborative Governance Approaches towards Urban Transformation: Experiences from the CLEVER Cities Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rptpxx:v:13:y:2012:i:4:p:509-527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rptp20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.